One example of applying the principle of beneficence in a study involving human subjects could be ensuring that participants are provided with adequate information about the potential risks and benefits of participating in the study. This includes obtaining informed consent from participants, which allows them to make an informed decision about whether or not to participate based on their understanding of the potential benefits to themselves and to society, as well as any potential risks or discomforts involved.
Which of the following is an example of how the principle of beneficence can be applied to a study employing human subjects?
Additionally, researchers might take steps to minimize any potential harm to participants by implementing safety measures, providing support or counseling services if needed, and ensuring that participants have the option to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty.
Overall, the principle of beneficence in research involving human subjects emphasizes the importance of promoting the well-being of participants and maximizing potential benefits while minimizing risks and harm.
Out of the following options, the one that best exemplifies the principle of beneficence is:
Providing ongoing monitoring of participants for potential side effects and offering appropriate medical care if needed.
Here’s why:
The principle of beneficence revolves around maximizing benefits and minimizing risks for research participants. By offering ongoing monitoring and medical care, the study actively works to ensure the well-being of the participants, aligning with this principle.
Some of the other options might be relevant to research ethics, but not directly beneficence:
Giving participants the right to withdraw from the study at any time – This relates to the principle of autonomy (respecting participants’ choices).
Using deception in the research design – This would generally be considered unethical as it undermines informed consent, a principle linked to both autonomy and beneficence.
Offering financial compensation for participation – While this can incentivize participation, it’s not directly related to beneficence. It can become problematic if the compensation is too high and influences someone’s decision to participate despite potential risks.
Beneficence goes beyond simply not harming participants. It actively seeks to improve their well-being through the research process.